Morphosyntactic Interference in EFL Written Compositions
Resumen
Morphosyntactic interference significantly impacts the acquisition of English as a foreign language (EFL), presenting challenges in students' writing skills. This study seeks to examine the prevalence and types of morphosyntactic errors in EFL students' written compositions and text translations, identifying patterns by genre and their pedagogical implications. The research uses a mixed methods approach with a sample of 28 first-level students (14 men, 14 women) from the National and Foreign Languages Pedagogy program at the Technical University of Cotopaxi, Pujilí Extension. Hallazgos reveal distinct error patterns by gender. Subject-verb agreement errors dominate writing tasks for both genders (14% in men, 13% in women). However, substitution errors (14% women vs. 7% men) and omissions (7% women vs. 4% men) are more common among women. In translation exercises, substitution errors prevail, with a higher percentage among women (16% vs. 13% men). The study concludes that morphosyntactic error patterns differ by gender, highlighting the need for gender-specific teaching strategies in EFL instruction. Furthermore, the persistent influence of Spanish as a mother tongue highlights the importance of contrastive analysis in teaching. An adapted pedagogical approach is recommended to effectively address gender-specific challenges and improve EFL learning outcomes.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Abuhamda, E., Ismail, I. A., & Bsharat, T. R. (2021). Understanding quantitative and qualitative research methods: A theoretical perspective for young researchers. International Journal of Research, 8(2), 71-87. https://n9.cl/jhhzpm
Al-Sharafi, Y. M. A. (2023). A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Yemeni Students’ Writing Compositions. مجيدة, 16(16), 170-170. https://n9.cl/rxk4k6
Badilla, D. C., & Núñez, V. M. (2020). Lexical Errors in EFL Students’ Written Production. LETRAS, (68), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.15359/rl.2-68.7
Bonilla López, M. (2023). Patterns of errors in texts written by Costa Rican university English learners: A corpus-aided study. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 23(1), 345-372. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v23i1.51485
Brandt, P. & Herzberg, P. (2023). Do Men Apply Differently Than Women? An Analysis of Language in Standardized Application Documents. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 52, 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09909-0
Blumstein, S.E. (2022). Putting Words Together: Syntax. In: When Words Betray Us. (pp. 55-73). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95848-0_5
Cordero, D. & Martin, V. (2020). Lexical Errors in EFL Students’ Written Production. Letras, 68, 175-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/rl.2-68.7
Daquilema Chorlango, S. T., & Arias Arroyo, P. A. (2024). Errores morfosintácticos en el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera: El contexto de estudiantes universitarios: Morphosyntactic errors in learning English as a foreign language: The context of university students. Revista Scientific, 9(31), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2024.9.31.2.46-67
Díaz, L. C., Fuentealba, J.T., Maureira, A. N., & Pedreros, Y. P. (2020) Teachers’ Essay Writing: An Analysis Of Their Grammatical And Lexical Errors. Lenguas Modernas, (55), 9-36. https://n9.cl/par1t
10. Diha, H. (2022). Error Analysis in Mother Tongue (Bima Language) Interference In Writing Skill. PENA: Jurnal Pendidika Bahasa, Sastra, & Pengajaran, 2(01), 1-9. https://n9.cl/fzys2
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Galkina, A. & Radyuk, A. (2019). Grammatical interference in written papers translated by Russian and American students. Training, Language and Culture, 3(3), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.29366/2019tlc.3.3.6
Goldin, M. (2021). Language activation in dual language schools: the development of subject-verb agreement in the English and Spanish of heritage speaker children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.2005529
Khatter, S. (2019). An Analysis of the Most Common Essay Writing Errors among EFL Saudi Female Learners (Majmaah University). Arab World English Journal, 10 (3) 364-381. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.26
Murtiana, R. (2019). An Analysis of Interlingual and Intralingual Errors in EFL learners compositions. Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v4i2.2544
Müngen, A. (2023). Exploring Lexical Richness in English-Language theses Across Disciplines: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 12(2), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.042
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524537
Petersen, J. (2018). Gender Difference in Verbal Performance: a Meta-analysis of United States State Performance Assessments. Education Psychology Review, 30, 1269–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9450-x
Quezada, A., Katherine, P., Benitez, C., Carmen, D. (2021) . A case study on the most common mechanical errors affecting EFL writing skills in high school students [Tesis de Licenciatura en pedagogía de los idiomas nacionales y extranjeros, Universidad Particular de Loja]. Repositorio institucional UTPL http://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/handle/20.500.11962/28938
Ramzan, M., Azmat, Z., Afsheen Khan, M., & Nisa, Z. un. (2023). Subject-Verb Agreement Errors in ESL Students’ Academic Writing: A Surface Taxonomy Approach. Linguistic Forum - A Journal of Linguistics, 5(2), 16–21. https://linguisticforum.com/index.php/ling/article/view/175
Ramadan E. S. & Jember, B. A. (2024). Step toward effective language learning: an insight into the impacts of feedback-supported tasks and peer-work activities on learners’ engagement, self-esteem, and language growth. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(39), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00261-5
Resueno, C., & De Leon, K. M. (2023). Morpho-Syntactic Translations: An Error Analysis. The QUEST: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.60008/thequest.v2i2.89
Ridha, M. (2020). A Morphosyntactic study of Iraqi EFL college students’ written essays: A corpus based analysis. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, SP-12, 145-151. https://n9.cl/1nrqb
Silva, J. (2022). Comparative Linguistic Analysis of English and Spanish Phonological System. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 25, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1152
Soto, S., Vargas, E., Cajamarca, C., & Escobar, M. (2020). The most common errors within the written discourse of EFL beginners at Ecuadorian universities. Machala, Ecuador: Editorial UTMACH. https://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/handle/48000/15729
Vázquez-Cano, E., González, A.I.H. & Sáez-López, J.M. (2019) An analysis of the orthographic errors found in university students’ asynchronous digital writing. J Comput High Educ 31, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9189-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v10i2.8880
Enlaces de Referencia
- Por el momento, no existen enlaces de referencia
Polo del Conocimiento
Revista Científico-Académica Multidisciplinaria
ISSN: 2550-682X
Casa Editora del Polo
Manta - Ecuador
Dirección: Ciudadela El Palmar, II Etapa, Manta - Manabí - Ecuador.
Código Postal: 130801
Teléfonos: 056051775/0991871420
Email: polodelconocimientorevista@gmail.com / director@polodelconocimiento.com
URL: https://www.polodelconocimiento.com/