English Language Teachers versus the problem to write a scientific paper

Luís Fernando Barriga-Fray, Johanna Isabel Barriga-Fray, Jennifer Karina Flores-Galeano, Jessica Elizabeth Guamán-Gallegos

Resumen


The advent to develop an investigative society, has urged professionals to experience a subit change in the field of higher education in Ecuador. However, the production of academic results in the Language Center at the National University of Chimborazo has been minimized and undervalued. Even though teachers of English are aware of the professional and financial benefits of writing a scientific paper, most of them believe that they were not trained enough to do so. Therefore, this paper pretends to provide the steps, hints or clues in order to assist and encourage novel writers to present their findings within scientific settings.


Palabras clave


English language; teachers; scientific paper; process, steps.

Texto completo:

PDF HTML XML

Referencias


Abreu, J. L. (2015). Análisis al Método de la Investigación. Revista Daena (International Journal of Good Conscience), 10(1).

Altbach, P. (2015). What higher education does right: A millennium accounting. International higher education, (18).

Amezcua, M. (2015). La Búsqueda Bibliográfica en diez pasos. Index de Enfermería, 24(1-2), 14-14.

Bromme, R., Thomm, E., & Ratermann, K. (2016). Who knows? Explaining Impacts on the Assessment of our own Knowledge and of the Knowledge of Experts. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie.

Castle, J., & Keane, M. (2016). Retreating to Write: Are Publications the Only Important Outcome?. Alternation, 23(1), 265-284.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (2014). Culture, time, and the development of talent. In The Systems Model of Creativity (pp. 27-46). Springer Netherlands.

Cuban, L. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice?. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 109-125.

Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502-1505.

García, J., & Alarcón, E. (2015). Lineamientos metodológicos para redactar artículos de investigación. Lista de Árbitros, 315.

Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine. John Wiley & Sons.

Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students' perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1-9.

Howard, L. W., Tang, T. L. P., & Austin, M. J. (2015). Teaching critical thinking skills: Ability, motivation, intervention, and the Pygmalion effect. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 133-147.

Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69.

Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., & Lê, J. K. (2014). Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 274-287.

Juve, G., Chervenak, A., Deelman, E., Bharathi, S., Mehta, G., & Vahi, K. (2013). Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(3), 682-692.

Lefevere, A. (2014). Why waste our time on rewrites?. The manipulation of literature: Studies in literary translation, 215-43.

Lester, J. D., & Lester Jr, J. D. (2015). Writing Research Papers: A Complete Guide (paperback). Pearson.

López Leyva, S. (2013). El proceso de escritura y publicación de un artículo científico. Revista Electrónica Educare, 17(1).

Mulligan, A., Hall, L., & Raphael, E. (2013). Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 132-161.

Nordin, S. M. (2017). The best of two approaches: Process/genre-based approach to teaching writing. The English Teacher, 11.

Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research. John Wiley & Sons.

Serrat, O. (2017). On Knowledge Behaviors. In Knowledge Solutions (pp. 979-984). Springer Singapore.

Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., & Barabási, A. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312), aaf5239.

Snow, E. L., Allen, L. K., Jacovina, M. E., Crossley, S. A., Perret, C. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Keys to detecting writing flexibility over time: entropy and natural language processing. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(3), 40-54.

Tello, C. (2015). Políticas educativas, educación superior y proceso de Bolonia en Latinoamérica. Crítica Educativa, 1(1), 80-97.

Vitse, C. L., & Poland, G. A. (2017). Writing a scientific paper—A brief guide for new investigators. Vaccine, 35(5), 722-728.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v4i11.1177

Enlaces de Referencia

  • Por el momento, no existen enlaces de referencia
';

Bookmark and Share




Polo del Conocimiento              

Revista Científico-Académica Multidisciplinaria

ISSN: 2550-682X

Casa Editora del Polo                                                 

Manta - Ecuador       

Dirección: Ciudadela El Palmar, II Etapa,  Manta - Manabí - Ecuador.

Código Postal: 130801

Teléfonos: 056051775/0991871420

Email: polodelconocimientorevista@gmail.com / director@polodelconocimiento.com

URL: https://www.polodelconocimiento.com/