Applications of bone grafts in atrophic ridges. Literature review

Juan Carlos Cabrera Yánez, Joselyne Nayelly Jara Sangurima, David Pineda Álvarez

Resumen


Objective: The objective is to perform a mapping through a review of the existing literature to determine the treatment for bone graft application, either vertically, horizontally, or in a combination of both. Materials and methods: The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and employed an exhaustive search strategy using major databases, keywords for this study, and Boolean operators. Inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials and case series reporting on the use and application of a bone graft. As a result, the search identified 30 studies focused on the application of bone grafts in atrophic alveolar ridges.

Result: After identifying 2,129 documents including articles, monographs, etc., the articles were reviewed, several were excluded, and finally, only 30 were selected, as they addressed the application of bone grafts and also met the proposed criteria for this review.

Conclusion: Autografts are the “gold standard” in bone regeneration due to their excellent characteristics, but they have high rates of resorption and complications. Xenografts offer high biocompatibility and volumetric stability, although they show associated risks. Alloplastic grafts have also shown very successful results. Therefore, there is no single technique; osseous

integration and volumetric stability are key in choosing the appropriate procedure, and material selection should be based on the patient's clinical need.


Palabras clave


Natural bone grafts; Xenograft and autograft in the maxilla; Maxillary bone graft; Maxillary ridge augmentation; maxillary allograft.

Texto completo:

PDF HTML

Referencias


Zhao R, Yang R, Cooper PR, Khurshid Z, Shavandi A, Ratnayake J. Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments. Molecules. 18 de mayo de 2021;26(10):3007.

Cha HS, Kim JW, Hwang JH, Ahn KM. Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 31 de marzo de 2016;38(1):19.

Salmerón Escobar JI. Preprosthetic surgery: A critical analysis. Rev Esp Cir Oral Maxilofac. agosto de 2007;29(4):228-39.

Ciszyński M, Dominiak S, Dominiak M, Gedrange T, Hadzik J. Allogenic Bone Graft in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments. Int J Mol Sci. enero de 2023;24(23):16598.

Matos JDM de, Nakano LJN, Silva SAB da, Nascimento JA do, Aureliano GMG, Andrade VC, et al. Los Injertos Óseos Homogéneos como una Alternativa en los Tratamientos de Rehabilitación Oral con Implantes Dentales. Int J Odontostomatol. diciembre de 2020;14(4):678-84.

Mahardawi B, Rochanavibhata S, Jiaranuchart S, Arunjaroensuk S, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. Autogenous tooth bone graft material prepared chairside and its clinical applications: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1 de enero de 2023;52(1):132-41.

Urban IA, Montero E, Amerio E, Palombo D, Monje A. Techniques on vertical ridge augmentation: Indications and effectiveness. Periodontol 2000. octubre de 2023;93(1):153-82.

Correia F, Pozza DH, Gouveia S, Felino AC, Faria-Almeida R. Advantages of Porcine Xenograft over Autograft in Sinus Lift: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Materials. 21 de junio de 2021;14(12):3439.

Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Rossi F, Perale G. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? [citado 5 de abril de 2025]; Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpe.13058

Miron RJ. Optimized bone grafting. Periodontol 2000. 2024;94(1):143-60.

Starch-Jensen T, Deluiz D, Vitenson J, Bruun NH, Tinoco EMB. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 31 de marzo de 2021;12(1):e1.

Miron RJ, Zhang Q, Sculean A, Buser D, Pippenger BE, Dard M, et al. Osteoinductive potential of 4 commonly employed bone grafts. Clin Oral Investig. noviembre de 2016;20(8):2259-65.

García Martí CD, Pérez Padrón A, Pérez Quiñones JA, Bello Fuentes R, Pérez Padrón A, García Martí CD, et al. Utilización de biomateriales e injertos óseos autólogos en pacientes con atrofia alveolar. Rev Médica Electrónica. octubre de 2020;42(5):2366-77.

Buser D, Urban I, Monje A, Kunrath MF, Dahlin C. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: Basic principle, progress over 35 years, and recent research activities. Periodontol 2000. octubre de 2023;93(1):9-25.

Martínez Álvarez O, Barone A, Covani U, Fernández Ruíz A, Jiménez Guerra A, Monsalve Guil L, et al. Injertos óseos y biomateriales en implantología oral. Av En Odontoestomatol. junio de 2018;34(3):111-9.

Al-Moraissi E, Alhajj WA, Al-Qadhi G, Christidis N. Bone Graft Osseous Changes After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Systematic Review. J Oral Implantol. 1 de octubre de 2022;48(5):464-71.

Onişor-Gligor F, Juncar M, Câmpian RS, BăciuŢ G, Bran S, BăciuŢ MF. Subantral bone grafts, a comparative study of the degree of resorption of alloplastic versus autologous grafts. Romanian J Morphol Embryol Rev Roum Morphol Embryol. 2015;56(3):1003-9.

Chiliquinga BRC, Cordova BRG, Delgado ERE, Gómez JLT. Injertos óseos para implantología oral, técnicas y protocolos. Polo Conoc. 21 de marzo de 2024;9(3):3307-23.

AlGhamdi AS, Shibly O, Ciancio SG. Osseous grafting part II: xenografts and alloplasts for periodontal regeneration--a literature review. J Int Acad Periodontol. abril de 2010;12(2):39-44.

Rodriguez AE, Nowzari H. The long-term risks and complications of bovine-derived xenografts: A case series. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019;23(5):487-92.

Chatelet M, Afota F, Savoldelli C. Review of bone graft and implant survival rate : A comparison between autogenous bone block versus guided bone regeneration. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1 de abril de 2022;123(2):222-7.

De Angelis P, Cavalcanti C, Manicone PF, Liguori MG, Rella E, De Rosa G, et al. A Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration vs. the Shell Technique Using Xenogeneic Bone Blocks in Horizontal Bone Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Dent J. 9 de mayo de 2024;12(5):137.

Starch-Jensen T, Deluiz D, Tinoco EMB. Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Allogeneic Bone Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 31 de marzo de 2020;11(1):e1.

Sapoznikov L, Humphrey M. Progress in Dentin-Derived Bone Graft Materials: A New Xenogeneic Dentin-Derived Material with Retained Organic Component Allows for Broader and Easier Application. Cells. 31 de octubre de 2024;13(21):1806.

Oguić M, Čandrlić M, Tomas M, Vidaković B, Blašković M, Jerbić Radetić AT, et al. Osteogenic Potential of Autologous Dentin Graft Compared with Bovine Xenograft Mixed with Autologous Bone in the Esthetic Zone: Radiographic, Histologic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation. Int J Mol Sci. 29 de marzo de 2023;24(7):6440.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v10i7.9922

Enlaces de Referencia

  • Por el momento, no existen enlaces de referencia
';

Bookmark and Share




Polo del Conocimiento              

Revista Científico-Académica Multidisciplinaria

ISSN: 2550-682X

Casa Editora del Polo                                                 

Manta - Ecuador       

Dirección: Ciudadela El Palmar, II Etapa,  Manta - Manabí - Ecuador.

Código Postal: 130801

Teléfonos: 056051775/0991871420

Email: polodelconocimientorevista@gmail.com / director@polodelconocimiento.com

URL: https://www.polodelconocimiento.com/