The Effect of Robotics on Motivation and Computational Thinking in English Learning
Resumen
This study examines the influence of robotics-based learning on students’ motivation and computational thinking in the context of English language education. It responds to the persistent challenge of engaging learners in meaningful, technology-integrated language instruction that fosters both cognitive and linguistic development. Using a quantitative pretest-posttest design complemented by qualitative observations, the study involved 86 secondary students divided into experimental and control groups. The intervention consisted of interdisciplinary workshops integrating English, Mathematics, and Computing Systems, where students programmed robots using English commands. Statistical analyses revealed significant improvements in motivation (t (84) = −22.10, p < .001, d = 2.41) and computational thinking in the experimental group compared to the control group. Qualitative notes further illustrated increased engagement, authentic language use, and collaborative problem-solving. These findings confirm that robotics not only enhances learners’ motivation and cognitive abilities but also transforms the use of English into a functional and creative communicative tool. The study concludes that robotics-based instruction, supported by interdisciplinary collaboration, offers an effective pathway to integrate linguistic, technological, and motivational dimensions in 21st-century education.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Ahmad, S., Rahman, M., & Zainuddin, N. (2023). Integrating robotics in language education: A pathway to learner engagement and innovation. Computers & Education, 195, 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104706
Alonso-García, S., Rodríguez-García, A. M., & Sánchez, A. (2024). Educational robotics and computational thinking: Systematic review and future perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1559–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11752-1
Amri, M., Rahman, N., & Jamil, M. (2022). Adaptation of the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) in technology-mediated EFL learning contexts. Asian EFL Journal, 24(6), 42–58. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2020). Mapping computational thinking through curriculum integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09628-3
Aydin, S., & Kara, M. (2023). Motivation and engagement in technology-enhanced language learning: A study on robotics integration. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langlt.2023.102121
Brito, A., Oliveira, M., & Silva, L. (2023). Balancing human agency and digital innovation in education: A constructivist approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107882
Calderón, P., & Sánchez, D. (2023). Aprendizaje por construcción digital: El legado de Papert en la era de la inteligencia artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 14(39), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2023.39.1502
Chalmers, C., Carter, M. L., & Cooper, G. (2021). The impact of robotics on problem-solving and engagement in education: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1663–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13057
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Costa Junior, A., Ribeiro, P., & Fernandes, L. (2024). Robotics, motivation, and cognitive development in primary education: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231113200
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351006769
Ellis, R. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 400–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12296
Gardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude/Motivation Test Battery: Technical report. University of Western Ontario. https://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/docs/englishamtb.pdf
González, P., & Valdivieso, J. (2022). Motivación y acción comunicativa en el aprendizaje del inglés: Una mirada constructivista. Revista Educación y Tecnología, 13(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.35830/edutec.v13i2.1489
Kerimbayev, N., Kultan, J., & Utegen, B. (2023). Robotics and computational thinking: Developing 21st-century skills in schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5817–5835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11577-y
Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2023). Computational thinking education: A global perspective and curriculum framework. Computers & Education, 198, 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104765
Li, H., & Liu, S. (2021). Robot-assisted language learning: Pedagogical affordances and student outcomes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 846–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820912351
Liang, J., & Du, X. (2025). Enhancing computational thinking and motivation in EFL through robotics and unplugged coding. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2312659
López-González, A., & Pujadas, M. (2023). Educational robotics as a motivational factor in English learning. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 25(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2023.25.e19
Martínez-Agudo, J. D. (2022). Motivation and attitudes in EFL learning in Latin America: A contextualized review. System, 108, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102853
Martins, R., & Silva, P. (2022). Interrelations between motivation and computational thinking in STEAM education. Computers & Education Open, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100082
Ministerio de Educación. (2023). Currículo de Educación General Básica y Bachillerato: Enfoques STEAM y competencias digitales. Quito: Gobierno del Ecuador. https://educacion.gob.ec
Morales, G., & Jaramillo, P. (2022). Educación interdisciplinaria y pensamiento complejo: Retos para la docencia en América Latina. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 52(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.48102/rlee.2022.52.1.215
Muñoz-Carril, P. C., González, M. C., & Sánchez, M. R. (2023). Gamification and robotics in EFL learning: Enhancing motivation and interaction. Journal of Language and Education, 9(3), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.157
Narváez, C. A., Narváez, E. Y., Yagos, C. M., & Narváez, M. E. (2024). Tecnología: aliada del ser humano o un enemigo silencioso. Ciencia Digital, 8(3), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v8i3.3450
Nascimento, L., & Viana, M. (2023). Constructionism and robotics in education: Reexamining Papert’s legacy in the digital era. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 37, 100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100593
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Peña, C., & Quintero, D. (2022). Robótica educativa en América Latina: Avances y desafíos para la inclusión y el aprendizaje activo. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 84, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num84-14169
Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2023). Assessing computational thinking through robotics-based problem-solving tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107513
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/9781462547637
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2023). Demystifying computational thinking in education: Current research and practice. Educational Psychologist, 58(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2161162
Villalobos, A., Rojas, L., & Herrera, M. (2021). Robótica educativa para el desarrollo del pensamiento científico en América Latina. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología, 32(63), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.33255/3263/1101
Wing, J. M. (2022). Computational thinking: What and why now? Communications of the ACM, 65(7), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3518538
Wu, J., Zhang, P., & Zhou, L. (2024). Revisiting motivation in technology-mediated English learning environments. System, 117, 103137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103137
Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). Human-centered technology integration in education: Lessons from constructivist practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1578–1592. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13237
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v10i11.10707
Enlaces de Referencia
- Por el momento, no existen enlaces de referencia
Polo del Conocimiento
Revista Científico-Académica Multidisciplinaria
ISSN: 2550-682X
Casa Editora del Polo
Manta - Ecuador
Dirección: Ciudadela El Palmar, II Etapa, Manta - Manabí - Ecuador.
Código Postal: 130801
Teléfonos: 056051775/0991871420
Email: polodelconocimientorevista@gmail.com / director@polodelconocimiento.com
URL: https://www.polodelconocimiento.com/












